Emily Seibold vs Sai Chamarthi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Seibold vs S. Chamarthi

Emily Seibold
GER
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
30
-
Height
-
462
C. Rank
822
442
Best Rank
773
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Sai Chamarthi
IND
w
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
30
-
Height
-
462
C. Rank
822
442
Best Rank
773
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Seibold 1 - 0 Chamarthi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Emily Seibold winning 2 and Sai Chamarthi winning 0. The last match between Emily Seibold and Sai Chamarthi was at the W15 Ahmedabad, 24-02-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Emily Seibold getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Seibold | 1 |
| Chamarthi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Ahmedabad(02-24-22)
Emily Seibold
6
6
Sai Chamarthi
1
0
E. Seibold vs S. Chamarthi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.52% (199-166) | Career Total W/L | 51.57% (131-123) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Seibold vs S. Chamarthi Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Emily Seibold has won 34.97% of points on their second serve, while Sai Chamarthi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Emily Seibold, in recent form, has won 49.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sai Chamarthi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.31% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Emily Seibold has saved 45.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sai Chamarthi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Emily Seibold has won 60.00% of matches played (W/L 36/24), with Sai Chamarthi winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Emily Seibold has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 38/28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 10/15). Sai Chamarthi has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 7/5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Emily Seibold has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.10% of matches (W/L 23/18), where as Sai Chamarthi has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Emily Seibold winning 1 times and Sai Chamarthi being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Emily Seibold winning 2 and Sai Chamarthi winning 0.
- The last match between Emily Seibold and Sai Chamarthi was at the W15 Ahmedabad, 24-02-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Emily Seibold getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Emily Seibold has played against opponents with an average rank of 424.15 while Sai Chamarthi has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Emily Seibold has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sai Chamarthi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Emily Seibold has converted 41.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sai Chamarthi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Emily Seibold vs Sai Chamarthi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Seibold vs S. Chamarthi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:58:0 | Average Match Time | 0:58:0 |
| 63% (20/32) | 1st Serve % | 51% (21/41) |
| 90% (18/20) | 1st Serve Win % | 29% (6/21) |
| 58% (7/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (8/20) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 66% (27/41) | Return Points Win % | 22% (7/32) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Seibold 45%, Chamarthi 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Seibold 59%, Chamarthi 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Seibold 54%, Chamarthi 0%.
E. Seibold Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 3-2 ret. | ||
S. Chamarthi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||

E. Seibold vs S. Chamarthi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.52% (199/166) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.76% (132/123) |
| 55.21% (445/361) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.89% (288/267) |
| 53.40% (3751/3274) | Games Win/Loss | 51.71% (2515/2349) |
| 57.58% (38/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.26% (104/95) |
| 55.89% (147/116) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.84% (21/22) |
| 38.89% (14/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 464 | Aces Total | 115 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1057 | Total Double Faults | 393 |
| 1:19:31 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 465.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 430.5 |
| 61% (10481/17300) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4357/7112) |
| 60% (6313/10481) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (2543/4357) |
| 44% (3004/6819) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1196/2755) |
| 50% (1239/2460) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (401/837) |
| 48% (8647/17948) | Return Points Win % | 45% (3005/6640) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 47.80% (87/95) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (31/31) |
| 61.20% (112/71) | Futures W/L | 52.36% (100/91) |
| 56% (196/350) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (130/253) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 36% (18/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (11/31) |
| 48% (41/85) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (21/48) |
| 89% (202/180) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (133/119) |
| 11% (202/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (133/14) |
| 13% (163/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (121/12) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
03:05 AM 18/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction08:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction06:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction08:00 AM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
03:05
H2H 0-0
03:30
H2H 0-0
03:50
H2H 0-0
04:05
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal