Emily Seibold vs Sai Chamarthi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W L W L
Form
W W L L L L W W L LHead-To-Head: Seibold 1 - 0 Chamarthi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Seibold winning 2 and Chamarthi winning 0. The last match between Seibold and Chamarthi was at the W15 Ahmedabad, 24-02-2022, Second, Clay with Emily Seibold getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emily Seibold | 1 |
| Sai Chamarthi | 0 |
W15 Ahmedabad(24-02-2022)
6
1
6
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Osaka VS Bronzetti PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Bellucci PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Emily Seibold
Player
Sai Chamarthi
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:58:0 | Average Match Time | 0:58:0 |
| 63% (20/32) | 1st Serve % | 51% (21/41) |
| 90% (18/20) | 1st Serve Win % | 29% (6/21) |
| 58% (7/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (8/20) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 66% (27/41) | Return Points Win % | 22% (7/32) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emily Seibold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Emily Seibold
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Sofia Milatova
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kathinka Von Deichmann
Player
Emily Seibold
79%
(
88 of
111)
1st Serve %
64%
(
81 of
126)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
81)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
42 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
126)
126
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(3) 6-7(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
23 of
34)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
51%
(
21 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
43
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Emily Seibold
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Antonia Vergara Rivera
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
86%
(
42 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Maria Eduarda Lages
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve %
79%
(
41 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Emily Seibold
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Ana Filipa Santos
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Sai Chamarthi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Kovaleva
Player
Sai Chamarthi
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
Player
Sai Chamarthi
48%
(
33 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
8
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandeepti Singh Rao
Player
Sai Chamarthi
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kundali Majgaine
Player
Sai Chamarthi
81%
(
64 of
79)
1st Serve %
83%
(
66 of
80)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
13%
(
2 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
53%
(
42 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Akanksha Dileep Nitture
Player
Sai Chamarthi
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
78)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Weronika Baszak
Player
Sai Chamarthi
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sai Chamarthi
Player
Kundali Majgaine
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (172/150) | Win/Loss | 52% (132/123) |
| 54% (389/325) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (288/267) |
| 53% (3304/2951) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2515/2349) |
| 58% (38/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (104/95) |
| 54% (120/101) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (21/22) |
| 39% (14/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 397 | Aces Total | 115 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 944 | Total Double Faults | 393 |
| 1:16:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 211.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 421.83 |
| 60% (9008/14894) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4357/7112) |
| 60% (5391/9008) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (2543/4357) |
| 44% (2584/5886) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1196/2755) |
| 50% (1048/2098) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (401/837) |
| 48% (7395/15483) | Return Points Win % | 45% (3005/6640) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (70/82) | Challenger W/L | 50% (31/31) |
| 60% (102/68) | Futures W/L | 52% (100/91) |
| 55% (169/308) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (130/253) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (17/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (11/31) |
| 46% (36/78) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (21/48) |
| 88% (178/157) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (133/119) |
| 12% (178/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (133/14) |
| 12% (144/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (121/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
